“One, middle-income taxpayers
would be encouraged to build their retirement portfolios—not
penalized for it. Most
mutual fund investors have less ability than high-income taxpayers
to rearrange their finances to minimize capital gains. When examining
this issue, the Wall Street Journal has reported on taxpayers
who have found themselves with little practical choice but to sell
shares to pay their taxes.
Two, deferral would recognize shareholders' expectations. People
who plan in advance to automatically reinvest dividends should
not find themselves taxed on what they didn't receive, didn't sell,
didn't spend—didn't even touch.
Three, permitting tax deferral would recognize the unique
nature of mutual fund investing. The investors who are automatically
reinvesting are in for the long haul. With a balanced, diversified
portfolio, they aren't making a buy-or-sell decision about each
holding and they aren't making year-to-year decisions about keeping
their money invested. What should be taxed is the growth of the
overall fund from the day a taxpayer first invests in it to the
day they dispose of it. Long-term investors need a long-term
tax policy.” |